It was totally logical for the Southern Baptist Convention to pass its "Resolution on Moral Character of Public Officials" in 1998.
Consider this "whereas" clause: "Some journalists report that many Americans are willing to excuse or overlook immoral or illegal conduct by unrepentant public officials so long as economic prosperity prevails." This was followed by: "Tolerance of serious wrong by leaders sears the conscience of the culture, spawns unrestrained immorality and lawlessness in the society, and surely results in God's judgment."
Thus, the SBC urged American leaders to "live by the highest standards of morality both in their private actions and in their public duties."
Yes, this resolution passed soon after the infamous claim by President Bill Clinton, a Southern Baptist, that "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
It was easy to predict who thought Clinton should exit the White House, noted conservative writer Marvin Olasky, who was writing "The American Leadership Tradition: Moral Vision from Washington to Clinton" at that time.
"In poker, you really don't know what cards someone has," said Olasky, reached by telephone. "You can't tell, with certainty, the character of a politician. … In that book, I argued that the state of a man's marriage was a strong tell. If he's faithful in his marriage, he's likely to be faithful to the nation."
Olasky's fellow religious conservatives praised the book. But things changed when he wrote a World magazine essay in 2016 entitled, "Unfit for power," arguing that Donald Trump should step aside as the Republican nominee.
"Clinton had denied having a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky, but her stained blue dress bearing Clinton's DNA was proof that he had used his power for adulterous purposes, and then lied about it," wrote Olasky. Then there was the videotape showing "Trump making lewd remarks about groping women's genitals. While many opponents … have criticized Trump's character, the video gave us new information about how Trump views power as a means to gratify himself."
Olasky recirculated this 2016 editorial after Trump's recent announcement that he would seek the presidency once again, igniting renewed social-media warfare among evangelicals about morality, character and the winner-take-all nature of American politics -- especially when Supreme Court seats are vacant.
In this Twitterstorm, one Olasky critic repeated an argument made by others: "Yes, absolutely I would rather have an adulterer as president who saves the lives of millions of unborn children than a man with one wife who says he's pro-life and does nothing. … Like Luther said -- better a Turk who rules well than an incompetent Christian prince."
Another added: "We have to weigh the unrighteousness of Hillary, of Biden … against that one recording. Because face it, that's all you solidly have against Trump, period. A guy being a dude. Not under church discipline."
The stakes are high, since White evangelicals play a strategic role in GOP primaries and national elections. In 2016, the Pew Research Center found that 78% of White evangelicals planned to vote for Trump -- but 30% said they backed Trump, himself. Trump's evangelical numbers remained strong in 2020, after filling several SCOTUS slots.
What next? In an editorial -- "Can DeSantis Win the Evangelical Vote?" -- the National Review argued that Florida Gov. Rod DeSantis has "taken a strong stance on many of the social issues that matter most to Evangelicals. … Between his three marriages, his lewd comments about groping women, and his friendship with Hugh Hefner, Trump was always an odd champion for the Moral Majority. DeSantis, on the other hand, has avoided scandal so far and cultivated a family-man public image."
Back in 2016, Olasky noted that opposing Trump was risky: "Our call for a different Republican candidate will lose us some readers and donors." Then in 2021, Trump-era tensions played a major role in his exit at World, after serving as editor for nearly three decades.
"Many people continue to stress that we are electing a president, not a preacher," said Olasky. "I am also aware that God can do many things outside the limitations of what I think about all of this."
But Olasky stands by his views in "The American Leadership Tradition" about fidelity and character. "From my selfish point of view," he added, "the whole Trump era has been a vindication of that book."